Sookmyung Institute for Multicultural Studies

Current Issue

OMNES: The Journal of Multicultural Society - Vol. 8 , No. 2

[ Article ]
OMNES: The Journal of Multicultural Society - Vol. 8, No. 2, pp.37-66
ISSN: 2093-5498 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Jan 2018
Received 30 Nov 2017 Reviewed 7 Dec 2017 Accepted 27 Dec 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15685/omnes.2018.01.8.2.37

Immigration and the Boundaries of Social Citizenship in East Asia: Theoretical Considerations in a Comparative Perspective
Ijin Hong
Institute for Welfare State Research (ISWR) in Yonsei University (ijinhong@hotmail.com)

Funding Information ▼

Abstract

Welfare systems in South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan were traditionally geared towards economic growth and productivity, rather than focusing on social rights. However, with increasing social policy commitments and migratory inflows in recent years, questions of who is deserving what in redistributive terms are increasingly relevant for these welfare latecomers, as it has been the case for European welfare states. By connecting discourses on social citizenship in East Asia to broader theoretical debates, this study aims to provide some conceptual instruments for a deeper analysis of social rights in this region in the face of increasing immigration trends. It is suggested that the lack of a differentiation between the ideas of status, identity, and social rights may lead to an ethnocentric understanding of social citizenship, which ill fits with the human rights perspective.


Keywords: social citizenship, immigration, East Asia, welfare state

Acknowledgments

Previous ideas and drafts have been presented in the annual conferences of East Asian Social Policy (EASP), IMISCOE and ESPAnet Italia during summer 2014, and the Japanese Association of Social Policy Studies (JASPS) in June 2015. I owe thanks to Juan Carlos Trivino for his comments on an earlier manuscript. All flaws and imperfections in the paper fall under the sole responsibility of the author.


References
1. Amnesty International (2014). Abusive labour migration policies. London: Amnesty International Publications.
2. An, M. Y., & Peng, I. (2016). Diverging paths? A comparative look at childcare policies in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. Social policy & administration, 50(5), 540-558.
3. Baik, T. U. (2012). Emerging regional human rights systems in Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bauböck, R. & Guiraudon, V. (2009). “Introduction: realignments of citizenship: reassessing rights in the age of plural memberships and multi- level governance.” Citizenship studies 13(5), 439-450.
5. Bell, D. A. (2015). Reconciling Confucianism and nationalism. Journal of Chinese philosophy. 41(1-2), 33-54.
6. Brubaker, R. (1992). Citizenship and nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Brubaker, R. (1998). “Myths and misconceptions in the study of nationalism.” In J. A. Hall (Ed.). The state of the nation: Ernest Gellner and the theory of nationalism (pp. 272-306). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 272–306.
8. Castles, S. (1986). “The guest-worker in Western Europe: An obituary.” International migration review 20(4), 761-778.
9. Castles, S. and Kosack, G. (1973). Immigrant workers and class structure in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Castles, S. and Schierup, C.U. (2010). Migration and Ethnic Minorities. In F. Castles et al. (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of the welfare state, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Chang, K.-S. (2012). Developmental Citizenship in Perspective: The South Korean case and beyond. In K.-S. Chang and B. S. Turner (Eds.). Contested citizenship in East Asia: Developmental politics, national unity, and globalization (pp. 182-202). New York: Routledge.
12. Dean, H. (2015). Social rights and human welfare. London and New York: Routledge.
13. Dirlik, A. (2012). Colonialism, revolution, development: a historical perspective on citizenship in political struggles in East Asia. In K.S. Chang and B.S. Turner (Eds.). Contested citizenship in East Asia. London & New York: Routledge.
14. Dwyer, P. (2004). Understanding social citizenship: Themes and perspectives for policy and practice. Bristol: The Policy Press.
15. Emmenegger, P., and Careja, R. (2012). From dilemma to dualization: Social and migration policies in the “reluctant countries of immigration.” In Emmenegger, P. (Ed.). The age of dualization: the changing face of inequality in deindustrializing societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Fields, G. (1994). “The Migration transition in Asia.” Asian and Pacific migration journal, 3(1), 7-30.
17. Foster, P. (1983). Access to welfare: an introduction to welfare rationing. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
18. Gran, B. K., & Clifford, E. J. (2000). “Rights and ratios? Evaluating the relationship between social rights and immigration.” Journal of ethnic and migration studies, 26(3), 417-447.
19. Halfmann, J. (2000). Welfare state and territory. In Bommes, M and Geddes, A. (Eds.). Immigration and Welfare: challenging the borders of the welfare state. New York Routledge.
20. Hammar, T. (1990). Democracy and the nation-state: aliens, denizens and citizens in a world of international migration. Avebury: Aldershot.
21. Hampshire, J. (2013). The politics of immigration. Cambridge & Maiden: Polity Press.
22. Hollifield, J.F. (2004). “The emergent migration state.” International migration review 38(3), 885-912.
23. Hong, I. and Atteraya, M.S. (2013). “A community needs assessment of migrant workers in Ansan city, South Korea.” Asia Pacific journal of social work and development 23(4), 253-269.
24. Isin, E.F. & Turner, B.S. (2007). “Investigating citizenship: An agenda for citizenship studies.” Citizenship studies 11(1), 5-17.
25. Isin, E. F., and Turner, B..S. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of citizenship studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Janoski, T., (2014). “Citizenship in China: A comparison of rights with the East and West.” Journal of Chinese political science, 19(4), 365-385.
27. Japan. Ministry of Health, Labour, Welfare. Retrieved from: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/ (visited on October 7th, 2017).
28. Japan. Statistical Office. Retrieved from: http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/nenkan/1431-02.htm (visited on 11/6/2015).
29. Jones, G. and Shen, H.H. (2008). “International marriage in East and Southeast Asia: Trends and research emphases.” Citizenship studies. 12(1), 9-25.
30. Joppke, C. (2007). “Transformation of citizenship: status, rights, identity.” Citizenship studies 11(1), 37-48.
31. Kaneko, K. (2009). “Foreign migrants in Taiwan and Japan: A comparative analysis.” Asia Journal of global studies. 3(1), 22-36.
32. Kashiwazaki, C. (2013). “Incorporating immigrants as foreigners: Multicultural politics in Japan.” Citizenship studies, 17(1), 31-47.
33. Kashiwazaki, C. (2009). The foreigner category for Koreans in Japan: Opportunities and constraints. In Ryang, S. & Lie, J. (Eds.). Diaspora without homeland: Being Korean in Japan. Univ. of California Press.
34. Kim, G.C. (2017). “Migration transition in South Korea: Features and factors.” OMNES: The journal of multicultural society, 8(1), 1-32.
35. Kim, J.K. (2011). “The politics of culture in multicultural Korea.” Journal of ethnic and migration studies, 37(10), 1583-1604.
36. Kim, N.H. (2012). “Multiculturalism and the politics of belonging: the puzzle of multiculturalism in South Korea.” Citizenship studies, 16(1), 103-117.
37. Kim, N.K. (2014). “Justifying grounds for multicultural policies in Korea: Universal human rights versus benefits of diversity.” Citizenship studies, 18(6-7), 724-740.
38. Kim, S.M. 2007. “Liberal nationalism and responsible citizenship in South Korea,” Citizenship studies, 11(5): 449-463.
39. Kong, D., Yoon, K., & Yu, S. (2010). “The social dimensions of immigration in Korea.” Journal of contemporary Asia, 40(2), 252-274.
40. Korea’s Minimum Income Guarantee Law. law.go.kr (visited on October 8th, 2017.
41. Korea, Republic of. National Health Insurance Service. Retrieved from: http://www.nhis.or.kr/retrieveHomeMain.xx, (visited on October 7th 2017).
42. Korea, Republic of. Ministry of Security and Administration. (2014). Statistics on foreign residents per region in year 2014. www.mopas.go.kr (in Korean).
43. Korpi, W., & Palme, J. (2007). The social citizenship indicator program (SCIP). Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University.
44. Lee, C.W. (2012). “How can you say you're Korean? Law, governmentality and national membership in South Korea.” Citizenship Studies, 16(1), 85-102.
45. Lipsky, M. (1979). Street level bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
46. Lister, R. and Dwyer, P. (2012). Citizenship and access to welfare. In Alcock, P.; May, M.; and S. Wright, S. (Eds.). The student’s companion to social policy (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
47. Marshall, T.H. (1950). Citizenship and social class, and other essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Meyers, E. (2000). “Theories of international immigration policy-A comparative analysis.” International migration review, 1245-1282.
49. MISSOC (Mutual Information System on Social Protection). (2017). Retrieved from: http://www.missoc.org/INFORMATIONBASE/COMPARAT IVETABLES/MISSOCDATABASE/comparativeTableSearch.jsp (visited on 2/9/2017).
50. Morrissens, A. and Sainsbury, D. (2005). “Migrants' social rights, ethnicity and welfare regimes.” Journal of social policy, 34(4), 637–660.
51. Nakamatsu, T. (2014). “Under the multicultural flag: Japan's ambiguous multicultural framework and its local evaluations and practices.” Journal of ethnic and migration studies, 40(1), 137-154.
52. Oh, J., Kang, D., Shin, J., Lee, S., Lee, S., Chung, K. (2011). Migration profile of the Republic of Korea. IOM MRTC Research Report Series, No. 2011-01. IOM Migration Research and Training Centre. Goyang-si, Republic of Korea.
53. Parreñas, R.S. & Kim, J.K. (2011). “Multicultural East Asia: An Introduction.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37(10), 1555-1561.
54. Pekkanen, R. (2006). Japan's dual civil society: Members without advocates. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
55. Piper, N. (2004). “Rights of foreign workers and the politics of migration in South East and East Asia.” International Migration, 42(5), 71-97.
56. Qi, H. & Shen, D. (2015). “Chinese traditional world citizenship thoughts and its impact on the cultivation of Chinese world citizenship awareness.” Citizenship Studies, 19(3-4), 267-284.
57. Roemer, F. (2017). “Generous to all or ‘insiders only’? The relationship between welfare state generosity and immigrant welfare rights.” Journal of European Social Policy, 27(2), 173-196.
58. Saraceno, C., Sartor, N., & Sciortino, G.(2013). Stranieri e disuguali: Le disuguaglianze nei diritti e nelle condizioni di vita degli immigrati. Bologna: Il Mulino.
59. Schattle, H. (2015). “Global citizenship as a national project: The evolution of segye shimin in South Korean public discourse.” Citizenship Studies, 19(1), 53-68.
60. Schmitter Heisler, B. (2008). The sociology of immigration: From assimilation to segmented assimilation, from the American experience to the global arena. In Brettell, C. and Hollifield, J. (Eds.). Migration theory: Talking across disciplines. New York: Routledge, 83-111.
61. Seol, D. (2012). “The citizenship of foreign workers in South Korea.” Citizenship Studies, 16(1), 119-133.
62. Shin, J.J. (2017). “A transnational approach to the integration of migrant workers: With focus on Korea’s employment permit system.” OMNES: The journal of multicultural society, 7(2), 128-153.
63. Soysal, Y. N. (1994). Limits of citizenship. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
64. Taipei Times. (2014 July 9). “Taipei’s social welfare unit accused of discrimination.” Taipei Times.
65. Taiwan. Immigration Office. Retrieved from: http://iff.immigration.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=1296466&ctNode=29986&mp=2 (visited on 11/6/2015).
66. Taiwan. Ministry of Health and Welfare Retrieved from: https://www.nhi.gov.tw/english/Content_List.aspx?n=C88B41A4EAB5E692&topn=778856C209BCE527 (visited on October 7th, 2017).
67. Taiwanese Public Assistance. Retrieved from: http://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOSAASW/cp-572-5035-103.html (visited on October 8th, 2017).
68. Taylor-Gooby, P. (2009). Reframing social citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
69. The Japan Times. (2014 July 19). Welfare ruling stuns foreigners. The Japan times.
70. The Korea Times. (2015 February 17). More babies abandoned by immigrant mothers. The Korea times.
71. Tierney, R. (2011). “The class context of temporary immigration, racism and civic nationalism in Taiwan.” Journal of Contemporary Asia, 41(2), 289-314.
72. Tilly, C. (Ed.). (1996). Citizenship, identity and social history. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press..
73. Toyota, M. (2008). “Editorial introduction: International marriage, rights and the state in East and Southeast Asia.” Citizenship Studies, 12(1), 1-7.
74. Turner, B. S. (2016). “We are all denizens now: On the erosion of citizenship.” Citizenship Studies, 20(6-7), 679-692.
75. Turner, B. (2012). National and social citizenship: Some structural and cultural problems with modern citizenship. In Chang, K. and Turnee,B. S. (Eds.). Contested citizenship in East Asia. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
76. Walker, A., & Wong, C.K. (2013). Ethnocentrism, the developmental state and East Asian welfare, In M. Izuhara (Eds.), Handbook on East Asian social policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Biographical Note

Ijin Hong earned a combined B.A. and M.A. degree in Sociology and Political Institutions in “La Sapienza” University in Rome, Italy (2006), and a PhD in Social Welfare in Yonsei University, Seoul (2011). She is currently Research Professor at the Institute for Welfare State Research (ISWR) in Yonsei University. Her main research interests include comparative social policy, labor market and immigration. Email: (ijinhong@hotmail.com)